The Silence of the Lambs

Reviewed by Matt Forrest

Opening Night verdict ⭐⭐⭐⭐

When it was first announced earlier this year that The Silence of the Lambs was being brought to the stage, I have to admit I was both intrigued and a little sceptical. It’s certainly a bold choice for a theatre production, given that the film is widely regarded as one of the greatest of all time and continues to feature highly in film polls. Then, of course, there are those much-loved and Oscar-winning performances from Jodie Foster and Sir Anthony Hopkins.

Thankfully, writer Gina Gionfriddo and director Nikolai Foster have done a superb job of bringing the story to the stage, creating something that feels fresh and distinctive rather than simply being a straight screen-to-stage adaptation.

Leaning more into Thomas Harris’s 1988 novel, the stage adaptation tells the story of FBI trainee Clarice Starling (Mollie Gallagher). She’s top of her class at Quantico and, despite still being relatively green, is given an assignment by Jack Crawford (Oliver Farnworth), head of the FBI’s Behavioural Science Unit. Crawford wants Starling to interview Dr Hannibal Lecter (John Partridge), a brilliant but deeply disturbed psychiatrist who is being held in a Baltimore hospital for the criminally insane. Lecter is also a particularly gruesome serial killer, with a rather unpleasant penchant for eating his victims.

Crawford hopes that Lecter might be able to provide some insight into another killer, known as ‘Buffalo Bill’ (Sam Jackson), who is currently at large. However, getting information from Lecter is never going to be straightforward. Before long, Clarice finds herself drawn into a dangerous psychological game of cat and mouse with a man who knows exactly how to get inside her head.

The production is smart enough to recognise that most of the audience coming to see it will already be familiar with the film, and so it wisely offers us something different. There’s much more interplay between Starling and Lecter, allowing us to delve deeper into their complex relationship, while the relationships between Starling and Crawford, and the shared history between Lecter and Crawford, are also given more room to develop. It adds an interesting new dynamic to the story, giving these familiar characters greater depth and adding further layers to an already gripping tale.

In addition, the production really leans into its theatrical setting, with Michael Taylor’s superb multi-purpose set design helps to create an atmosphere all of its own. As Clarice’s investigation progresses, we simultaneously see Buffalo Bill’s frustration mounting as he races to complete his “masterpiece”. Seeing both storylines unfold side by side creates an added sense of tension and urgency, keeping the pace moving even when the action itself is relatively restrained.

Taylor’s set is filled with dimly lit basements, shadowy corridors and grimy alleyways, it has a suitably dirty and grubby feel that fits the world of the story perfectly. This is in stark contrast to the recreation of Lecter’s iconic Perspex cell, where we get to see John Partridge switch effortlessly between a cold, calculating manipulator and something much more akin to a caged animal.

Partridge is a towering presence as Lecter, delivering a calm, measured performance filled with charm, wit and an unnerving stillness, punctuated by flashes of anger and rage. His physicality adds to the menace, and while a role like this could easily stray into hammy territory, Partridge never lets it, creating a Lecter who is genuinely unsettling.

Equally impressive is Mollie Gallagher in her professional stage debut. She strikes the perfect balance between Starling’s confidence and vulnerability, while her West Virginia accent is spot-on. She makes Starling a plucky, likeable heroine who is easy to root for.

The chemistry between Gallagher and Partridge is initially excellent, as they constantly jockey for position and size each other up, becoming increasingly fascinated by one another. Unfortunately, the final act loses some of this tension by shifting their relationship towards something closer to love, which doesn’t quite convince.

Sam Jackson gives a strong physical performance as Buffalo Bill, while the increased interaction between Bill and his victims adds an interesting layer to his character. Oliver Farnworth is also impressive as Jack Crawford, bringing warmth to the damaged, repressed mentor and giving us a real sense of his care for Starling, alongside his awareness of the danger he has placed her in.

It would have been easy for the production to rely on big jump scares and lashings of blood and gore. Instead, it wisely tones these elements down, meaning that when those moments do occur, they have far greater impact. The production relies much more on the psychological elements of the story to ratchet up the tension, building steadily towards a thrilling climax.

There are still plenty of memorable scenes and lines from the film, but this production is very much its own entity, offering something different while keeping you engaged from start to finish. Strong performances and high production values make for an entertaining and enjoyable night at the theatre, even if it doesn’t come served with fava beans and a nice Chianti!

The Silence of the Lambs is on at The Lowry until Saturday 10th October tickets and info available here.

Fatal Attraction

Reviewed by Paris Rogers

Opening Night verdict ⭐️⭐️⭐️

I feel lucky that I’ve not watched Fatal Attraction via Film or in the theatre before. It allowed me to have a completely clear slate and no comparison when writing this review.

Fatal Attraction by James Dearden follows Alex Forrest (Kym Marsh) as she takes us on an absolute roller-coaster of emotions ending in becoming unhealthy obsessed with Dan Gallagher (Oliver Farnworth) all resulting from a one night stand. 

The play had an extremely strong start, drawing me in with a spotlight on Dan Gallagher. His voice was clear and crisp and had a way of silencing the audience into their seats. It also started, light, upbeat and with Dan Gallagher in a happy marriage to Beth (Susie Amy). I sometimes struggle to gauge what’s going on in the beginning of a play and what relationship the characters have but the stereotypical marriage between the two was clear from the start and portrayed nicely on stage.

The set was almost black box theatre. Simple yet effective. The simplicity encouraged the audience to use more of their imagination and focus on the actors. It also permitted incredibly smooth scene changes. Video calls were used to transform the story from the 1980’s to modern day. I felt this was not needed and took the focus away from the dialogue and flow of the play. It felt awkward and pardon the pun, staged. However, I can understand that it is difficult to bring every scene of the film to the stage, these calls were a quick interject to keep the story moving.

There was an incredible amount of background noise used which set the scene but again took away the focus from the actors. I felt they had to work twice as hard to carry the scene along. This sometimes came across rushed and their accent fell now and then. 

Speaking of which, it is difficult enough to see facial expressions on stage without a lump of hair constantly covering an actor’s face. This meant the actors body language had an even greater role to play. At times this disappointingly did not match the dialogue. There were uncomfortable movements, especially walks off stage and jarred hand gestures throughout. 

One of the most iconic scenes in the film fell flat in the stage adaptation, when Dans wife Beth discovers her daughters pet rabbit has been boiled alive. I’m not certain how I would react if I found a cute bunny boiled on my stove, but I it wouldn’t be a single scream.

In comparison, Marsh put buckets of detail into her performance as Alex. The dialogue and scenes she had to deliver were undeniably challenging but she managed to make me feel compassion for her even at the evillest parts of her actions. Her approach to the character was not only exceptionally clever and thought through but made me constantly question her motives. Was she just ill and been taken advantage of or was she a calculated woman with hatred for men running through her veins? 

The ending to the play allowed me to interrogate two different scenarios in my mind. This permitted ongoing questions after leaving the theatre. The street was filled with different views and endings, it clearly provoked debates and conversations during and after.

Fatal Attraction is on at the Opera House until Saturday 26th February tickets available here.